IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

Case No. CIV-97-113-B

DOUGLAS G. DRY ET. AL.,

Plaintiffs,

V.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ET AL.

Defendants.

SCHEDULING ORDER

Having discussed with counsel their need for adequate discovery time, the complexity of the legal issues involved herein, and their caseloads, the court enters the following agreed upon Scheduling Order:

1. Joinder of Additional Parties or Amendments to the Pleadings By June 9. 1997
2. Exchange Witness and Exhibit Lists By July 7. 1997
3. Discovery Completed By October 6. 1997
4. All Dispositions, Motions Filed By October 13, 1997
5. Written Settlement Report Filed By November 10, 1997
6. Agreed Pretrial Order Submitted By December 4. 1997
7. Exchange All Trial Exhibits Except Demonstrative Exhibits By December 4, 1997
8. Requested Jury Instructions and Voir Dire, Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law (Non-Jury), and Trial Briefs Filed By December 4. 1997
9. Pretrial Conference December 11 , 1997
10. Motions in Limine Filed By December 15, 1997
11. Demonstrative Exhibits Exchanged By December 29, 1997
12. Trial Date January 5. 1998
13. Estimated Length of Trial  
14. Jury Non-Jury

 

IT IS THE FURTHER ORDER OF THE COURT that all cases scheduled for jury trial will be set for a settlement conference before a District Judge or Magistrate Judge.

IT IS THE FURTHER ORDER OF THE COURT that all parties are bound by this order, that no date will be changed except by written order of this court for good cause shown, and sanctions will be imposed for failure to comply with the directions of this order.

IT IS THE FURTHER ORDER OF THE COURT that ________________________________

 

IT IS SO ORERED this 12th day of May, 1997.

MICHAEL BURRAGE
CHIEF U. S. DISTRICT JUDGE

 

APPROVED:

Attorney(s) for the Plaintiffi(s) Attorney(s) for the Defendant(s)